Daily Kos
Political analysis and other daily rants on the state of the nation




































Thursday | March 06, 2003

Blair shifts position

First Blair said he would only go to war with the approval of a second UN Security Council resolution authorizing force. Then he said he would go to war even if one of the permanent members wielded an "unreasonable" veto. Now he says multipled "unreasonable" vetoes won't be enough to deter the UK's entry in the war.

So what is "unreasonable"? Apparently anyone who disagrees with him and Bush. So what happens if the majority of the council votes "no" on a second resolution? Would all those "no" votes be unreasonable and insufficient to deter him?

Posted March 06, 2003 06:44 AM | Comments (50)





Home

Archives
Bush Administration
Business and Economy
Congress
Elections
Energy
Environment
Foreign Policy
Law
Media
Misc.
Religion
War

© 2002. Steal all you want.
(For non-commercial use, that is.)