This Republican pollster loves Rush, saying he's better than blogs because Rush 1) does more research, 2) has better production values than ugly blogs, 3) is funnier, and 4) builds personal bonds with his audience (unlike bloggers).

So who do you think will be more influential in 15 years, the entire, collective blogosphere, or Rush?

(Incidentally, this isn't an ideological issue. There are plenty of Democrats who would probably agree with this guy's laughable tripe.)